Skip to main content

Out of the Bottle: Golden Tripel II

Round two of my Candi Sugar experiment is ready to go. After looking at my sugarless Abbey Blonde base beer, it's time to see how my Tripel turned out.

The beer pours with a deep gold hue that's slightly paler than the Blonde. It's topped by a dense bone-white cap. Head retention is decent, but not spectacular. A nice amount of lace is left behind.

I'm amazed at the clarity I got with this beer. There's much less haze than in my previous Tripel. In the picture, you can even see the Chimay logo on the backside of the glass I poured it in.

Pale fruits and fresh cut flowers greet the nose. Pear and green grape are the most prominent aromas. There's a very light coriander spice note. Letting the nose linger lets the floral aromas come out. There's no alcohol heat to be found.

In the mouth, the beer is dry and deceptively light. Carbonation is soft and perhaps a touch low for the style. The pale fruits from the nose are bolstered by bready grains. The beer's bitterness comes on quick with a spicy, yet flowery bite. Although Magnum hops provide most of the bitterness, it's the Styrian Golding hops that really come through to add a fresh cut flower complexity to the overall flavor. Despite the considerable strength, there are no alcohol flavors and only a touch of warmth going down. The floral bitterness lingers through the dry finish.

So, the main story here is that I've created a strong, yet eerily light beer. The Candi Sugar provided strength and lightness, plus additional sweet pale fruit flavors and aromas not found in the previous beer. It's the floral hops that really define this Tripel; however, even though the bitterness isn't all that great. Next up is the Quad. We'll find out about it tomorrow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In the Fermentor: Kitchen Sink Barleywine

The Leftovers It's time for a cleanup of leftover grains and partially used packets of hops from 2012. With the exception of the 2-Row base malt, everything in the recipe below has been sitting on the shelf, or in the fridge waiting to be used. I had several open hop packages, some leftover toasted malts and a half-full bottle of malt extract too. I also had yeast cultured from my White House Honey Porter . My decision was to use almost all of my leftovers and make a partial-mash Barleywine. The finished beer will be quite strong and quite bitter. A toasted malt backbone should nicely complement pine, spice and citrus hop flavors. Because of the beer's strength, it will not be ready for at least three months and should improve with age. The recipe has been scaled up to five gallons from the 2.5 gallons I actually brewed: Grains: 9 lbs Rahr 2-Row 8.5 oz Victory 7.5 oz Brown Hops: Bittering: 0.75 oz Chinook (11.1% a.a.): 60 min 0.5 oz Colum...

In the Fermentor: Flaming Pumpkin

I'll admit that I'm not a huge Pumpkin Beer fan. I didn't have one on my brewing calendar for this year and didn't have my sights set on one for next Fall either. Then my niece came along and threw down the gauntlet. She asked me to brew her a pumpkin beer and I accepted the challenge. I did a lot of reading to see how to best go about using pumpkin in beer. Some people mash it with the grains. Others add it to the brew kettle during the boil. Some add it to the primary or secondary fermentor. The consensus from professional brewers appears to be adding it to the mash, so I took the same approach. The pumpkin was cooked ahead of time by my girlfriend to soften it, convert some of the starch and help release some of its sugars. It then joined the grains in the mash. I really want the pumpkin pie effect here, so I've thrown in all of the requisite spices toward the end of the boil. I've also gone with just enough bitterness to balance the sweetness of the ...

Out of the Bottle: Flaming Pumpkin

It's Halloween night and Flaming Pumpkin is ready to frighten away the ghosts and goblins. Hopefully it won't also frighten away the people who drink it. This is my first Pumpkin Beer, so I was flying blind outside of doing research and trying commercially available brews. I basically cobbled together suggestions I thought were the best approach to the style, with a vision in my head of what the finished product should taste like. So how did it turn out? Pretty good. My goal was pumpkin pie in a bottle. What I got is more spice than sweet, but I still like it. The pie spices are right out front, with clove and cinnamon leading the way. The sweeter flavors are muted and focused toward dark sugars from the brown sugar and dark crystal malt. Bitterness is just enough, with no hop flavors competing with the spices. And what about the pumpkin? You can taste it. It's subtle. But you can definitely tell it's there. Overall? I'm quite happy and hope that my niece l...