Skip to main content

Kitchen Brewing Part 6: Making your own N/A Beer

Welcome to Part 6 of my Kitchen Brewing series. Today we'll be making our very own Non-Alcoholic (N/A) homebrew.

Why on earth would I want to make a Non-Alcoholic beer? Good Question!

There are lots of reasons behind why people eschew alcohol. I won't get into any of them here. The point is that there are many people who avoid alcohol, but still want the taste of beer from time to time. For these people, the mass-market commercial options are extremely limited. They can have N/A Pale Lager, N/A Amber Lager, N/A Hefewiezen (if they're lucky) and that's pretty much it.

What happens if that person wants something else? They're out of luck, unless they happen to live near a Craft Brewery that brews additional styles of N/A beer. For everyone else, the answer is to brew your own.

The first thing to understand about N/A beer (commercial, or otherwise) is that it isn't truly free of alcohol. It actually contains around 0.5% of the stuff. That news is important when we get to carbonation below.

What styles work best for N/A beer? My recommendation is anything that isn't hoppy like an IPA, or potent like Barleywines and Strong Belgians. This is because driving off the alcohol also drives off hop flavor and aroma. In addition, removing alcohol from beers that rely upon its character is rather pointless, as far as I'm concerned. With that in mind, I've decided to focus my efforts on Mild, Porter, Stout and other malt-driven styles with relatively low alcohol contents.

The basic technique behind N/A beer is to heat the beer to the boiling point of ethyl alcohol and hold it there until the alcohol evaporates. The magic temp is 173.3F. Since I don't have that level of temperature control, I heat the beer to a few degrees above that and hold it there for approximately 30 minutes. Of course, losing the alcohol also means losing liquid, which needs to be replaced with water. Although you can calculate how much alcohol you're going to lose and add the equivalent amount of water before doing the evaporation, Talking Barbi says "Math Class is tough." It's much simpler to measure out the volume of beer you want to make N/A, remove the alcohol and then add enough distilled or boiled water back until you have the same volume of liquid you started with. It's really just that easy.

Carbonation is where things get a little complicated. If you can force-carbonate, feel free to stop reading now. If you bottle-condition like me, please read on.

Heating your beer does more than get rid of the alcohol. It also kills off any yeast that may have been alive and well. This presents a bit of a problem at bottling time, because normally you simply add priming sugar, bottle you beer and let the yeast do its thing.

The solution is to introduce active yeast back into the beer. This doesn't mean simply tossing some dry yeast into the bottling bucket. It means making a starter, just like you probably did when you first brewed the beer.

The starter itself doesn't need to be too terribly big. You only need enough to get the yeast active, because just like with your regular beer, you'll be adding priming sugar. Being a Grade A nerd, I prefer making the starter using the same yeast strain I fermented the beer with. The magic amount is around a half-cup of starter per case of beer. If you go much higher, the taste of the un-hopped starter will creep into the finished beer. The quantity of priming sugar should be the same as what you would've used for the beer's alcoholic cousins.

My fist experiment with making N/A beer started with the Northern Brewer Dubbel kit that I got such a good deal on. Sighting my own recommendations, Dubbel isn't the best style to take N/A, but I had five gallons of the stuff. Sacrificing a six-pack worth as part of an experiment would be no great loss if my science project failed miserably.

So how did my first attempt go?  Not too shabby.

As I noted in my review of the Kit, I thought the beer was a little too boozy for the style. Since my N/A version didn't have any booze, that part of the beer's profile was MIA. The rest of the beer was pretty much the same, with a light bitterness, plus a nice mix of dark fruits, biscuits and a little spice.

I will mention that my recommendation of not going too crazy with your Starter size can be traced backed to this beer. I got a little generous, so there was some bonus sweetness at work that tasted nothing like the parent beer.

My next N/A attempt was with my Experimental Porter. Rather than tell you how that worked out here, you'll have to wait for the in-depth side by side comparison that will be in that beer's Out of the Bottle piece. Let's just say for now that it worked out quite well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In the Fermentor: Kitchen Sink Barleywine

The Leftovers It's time for a cleanup of leftover grains and partially used packets of hops from 2012. With the exception of the 2-Row base malt, everything in the recipe below has been sitting on the shelf, or in the fridge waiting to be used. I had several open hop packages, some leftover toasted malts and a half-full bottle of malt extract too. I also had yeast cultured from my White House Honey Porter . My decision was to use almost all of my leftovers and make a partial-mash Barleywine. The finished beer will be quite strong and quite bitter. A toasted malt backbone should nicely complement pine, spice and citrus hop flavors. Because of the beer's strength, it will not be ready for at least three months and should improve with age. The recipe has been scaled up to five gallons from the 2.5 gallons I actually brewed: Grains: 9 lbs Rahr 2-Row 8.5 oz Victory 7.5 oz Brown Hops: Bittering: 0.75 oz Chinook (11.1% a.a.): 60 min 0.5 oz Colum...

In the Fermentor: Flaming Pumpkin

I'll admit that I'm not a huge Pumpkin Beer fan. I didn't have one on my brewing calendar for this year and didn't have my sights set on one for next Fall either. Then my niece came along and threw down the gauntlet. She asked me to brew her a pumpkin beer and I accepted the challenge. I did a lot of reading to see how to best go about using pumpkin in beer. Some people mash it with the grains. Others add it to the brew kettle during the boil. Some add it to the primary or secondary fermentor. The consensus from professional brewers appears to be adding it to the mash, so I took the same approach. The pumpkin was cooked ahead of time by my girlfriend to soften it, convert some of the starch and help release some of its sugars. It then joined the grains in the mash. I really want the pumpkin pie effect here, so I've thrown in all of the requisite spices toward the end of the boil. I've also gone with just enough bitterness to balance the sweetness of the ...

Out of the Bottle: Flaming Pumpkin

It's Halloween night and Flaming Pumpkin is ready to frighten away the ghosts and goblins. Hopefully it won't also frighten away the people who drink it. This is my first Pumpkin Beer, so I was flying blind outside of doing research and trying commercially available brews. I basically cobbled together suggestions I thought were the best approach to the style, with a vision in my head of what the finished product should taste like. So how did it turn out? Pretty good. My goal was pumpkin pie in a bottle. What I got is more spice than sweet, but I still like it. The pie spices are right out front, with clove and cinnamon leading the way. The sweeter flavors are muted and focused toward dark sugars from the brown sugar and dark crystal malt. Bitterness is just enough, with no hop flavors competing with the spices. And what about the pumpkin? You can taste it. It's subtle. But you can definitely tell it's there. Overall? I'm quite happy and hope that my niece l...